I just returned from spending a couple days in Liverpool, the city of The Beatles. I stayed at the new Hard Days Night Hotel, sleeping below a huge air-brushed portrait of George Harrison. I’ll write more about the hotel, it was, to use a 60’s phrase, a trip. In the meantime, I have a lot of things to say about The Beatles, and their relationship to creativity and innovation. I spent an afternoon at The Beatles Story museum at Albert Dock, which had a great audio tour and memorabilia.
The anecdote that struck me was one told by their producer, George Martin. He recounted hearing the first tape of The Beatles and thinking it was awful. Brian Epstein, their manager, was insistent and George finally said, well, come down to London and let me evaluate them in person. He booked an hour of studio time but had low expectations. They arrived, were pleasant, polite, funny, and played with a lot of verve and energy. After they left Martin remarked to himself how charming and nice the boys had been, how much fun they had playing, and their “wit”. He noticed that after they were gone that he felt “diminished” by their absence. He noted to himself that if he felt this way, what might young people feel? That was the feeling he went with when he signed The Beatles. He remarked that he didn’t know at the time that The Beatles had been turned down by every record label in London, and if he had known, he wouldn’t have signed them.
There are several things about this anecdote that strike me for those seeking to innovate.
1.) Notice how you feel. Martin was self-aware enough to notice that he felt “diminished” by their absence. That was his clue to understanding how they affected their audiences. It takes real thoughtfulness to notice a subtle feeling like “diminished” doesn’t it? How many of us slow down often enough to notice what we are feeling about people and things? He was also impressed by their wit — their sense of fun was part of the reason he thought they had promise. Intuition informed him he was onto something, and he went with it.
2.) New and different almost always seems wrong at first. The Beatles had a new take on pop and at first nobody, that is the experts, got it (one famous comment about The Beatles — “guitar groups are on the way out”). They were ruled out by nearly all the experts. Martin was open enough to simply give them a chance and consider what was good about them. Positive evaluation allows for more possibility. Most disruptive innovations lack sophistication in some dimension; they haven’t been all polished up and featured out, so they appear imperfect. The raw chords of American R&B hadn’t been filtered and refined, The Beatles didn’t sound like “good” music to those used to something else.
3.) Persistence matters. Brian Epstein kept making his presentation, he believed in what he had and stayed after it. Â Most of us would have quit after the first two or three rejections.
4. Consumers know best. The fan base in Liverpool at the Cavern Club and the Casbah knew The Beatles were great two years before the experts did. They were ready for something new, ready for something fun, ready for something to lift their Liverpudlian blues. It’s old news really but it’s a lesson we often forget –consumers know best. If you want to innovate, see what people are doing, particularly those with nothing to lose. Notice what those people enjoy, and you’ll find the best clues to market acceptance of virtually any product.
5 responses to “Revisiting the Creativity & Innovation of The Beatles”
The new always looks different but may not initially look appealing. The Beatles were new and they were turned down by Decca Records because their demo tape was not that impressive. Alexander Bell was told by Western Union that there was no commercial potential in his invention – the telephone. The first Harry Potter manuscript was turned down by 6 major publishers. Heck, even my book was turned down by some publishers! It shows that it is always easier to be critical of the new than it is to see its potential.
Yes, absolutely. Thanks for your comment Paul. Affirmative Judgement should be taught as part of any innovation course!
thanks for this piece, dude. but i’ve got one personal quibble. i was like 11, 12 when the Beatles hit NYC radio (they did nothing for me). but the 1st night ‘she loves you’ et al was played on the radio, the TV news programmes were showing those dirty rebels, the Stones w/short clips of their London gigs. now /they/ turned my head around and rocked my world.
to each his/her own. i’m sending a link to this to my younger sister, a Beatles lover since way back when. thanks again. /rimone
The Stones were a bit like olives for me, I liked them a lot better when I got older. I saw them at Soldier Field in Chicago about 8 years ago and it was an incredible show.
Lots to learn about creativity from the Stones as well…they broke all the rules for pop by recording classic blues songs.
Thanks for your comment Slum Goddess.
What an incredible marketing lesson from an unlikely source! As a huge Beatles fan as a child, I didn’t have the ability to understand how innovative their music was, nor how much rejection proceeded their success. I really enjoyed this post!