Trends, Futurism, and Research

    Damaged Pure Michigan Brand Impedes Economic Development

    taintedpuremichiganv2Pure Michigan is a Damaged Brand

    As a Michigan resident I’ve followed the developments in Flint with a mixture of horror, sadness, outrage, and confusion.  This post is not about political blame. Having said that, I don’t deny the political element to the problem; it’s a sad tale of bad decisions on top of bad decisions, and some of those made for purely political reasons. Fact seeking people on both sides of the aisle need to take a very close look at what’s happened.

    The focus of this post is about the damage that has been done to the state of Michigan’s brand, Pure Michigan.  This is not being talked about, but it’s as damaging in the long run as the disaster itself. That damage to the impression and key message of the state will cost the good state of Michigan for years to come. Make no mistake, this problem in Flint means fewer new Michigan jobs and diminished future opportunities. The disaster in Flint, sadly, puts a stain on the Pure Michigan brand it will take years to clean up.

    Now and then you see how important — and fragile — a brand can be, and this disaster in Flint is a tragic clear case in point. The ruination of this once proud and authentic brand means that economic development across the entire state will be impacted. It will impact the tourist industry, manufacturing, and even agriculture. Would you buy fruit from a region where the water might be poisoned? It would give you pause for thought. Would you buy a home, or a second home in a state where water management is poorly done? Would you re-shore a plant in the state? Would you locate a high tech start up in Michigan? What was once taken for granted — safe water — is now an impediment to clean growth.

    Pure Michigan is (or was) a brilliant brand. It sums up in two simple words what people in Michigan, and our many tourist visitors, find to be lovely about the place –that’s it’s mostly, authentically, beautiful and pure. Outside of Detroit and a few other urban pockets in the state, it is hard to go anywhere that isn’t scenic. And water, we’re surrounded by it, and most of it is about as clean and pure as you’d hope for. Nestle bottles its Ice Mountain brand in Michigan. Ironically, even the Flint River, once quite polluted, is cleaner now than it’s been in 50 years. There are still trout, beavers, and bears in Michigan, and the forests have recovered after the clear cutting of over 100 years ago.

    The disaster clean up, the fix, will be expensive. So will the on-going medical treatment of all the people the mass poisoning has made sick. My heart bleeds most for the young children whose very brains have been impacted, and permanently. The City of Flint, a city that was once highly productive, will probably never recover. The recent small gains with manufacturers coming back to town will be halted. Property values there have disappeared and home owners are, overnight, ruined. All this is horrible, but it gets worse.

    Michigan itself, the entire state, is now painted with a brush the opposite of pure. It’s now an unhealthy place to live and work or establish a business. Not only unhealthy, but incompetent, unsafe, contaminated. This is the message that is being sent to the global marketplace right now. Maybe only Flint is actually ruined — but the brand Pure Michigan covers the entire state. The state-wide brand has been poisoned as badly as as the Flint water. Now the inherent brand promise feels like a very bad joke.

    If I’m a major manufacturer looking to locate a new plant somewhere, would I choose Michigan now? I would not, because people work at plants, and people are not going to want to move to Michigan. It won’t matter that Michigan is a right to work state because nobody will want to live here. But it’s “only Flint” you might say, and I would say, if the state allows this to happen in Flint, it could also happen in Benton Harbor, Traverse City, Lansing, Ann Arbor, Niles, or Detroit. I asked a CEO who is currently looking around for a place to locate a high tech start up. Star Sailor Power is one of those potentially huge companies in the new energy sector. In other words exactly what any state wants, high paying, clean jobs of the future. Here’s what Pamela Menges, Ph.D., a Michigan native, said:

    “I am the CEO of a funded high-tech start-up and we are seeking a state for our new head quarters.
    The situation in Flint and the apparent lack of responsible government and the continuing apparent
    problems with the political leadership surrounding water safety and resources gives me pause. Failing
    infrastructures throughout the US demand better government and more intelligent oversight. The 
    water issue is not just a quality of life issue, it is a matter of life and death in politically isolated
    communities like Flint.”

    At the core of any brand is the concept of trust. With a trust so broken, recovery is long and slow. The phrase “gives me pause” in Pamela Menges quote above is exactly what any brand, any state, does not want. This is what I mean when I say the brand has been tainted. This is how the brand damage will cost Michigan for years to come. Michigan will be ruled out.

    There have been brands that have had their names dragged through the mud in the past. Look at Tylenol. They recovered because they took massively fast action and put safety first. They took a big financial hit, but they recovered trust.

    Is that happening in Flint?  Is this happening in Michigan? No, all the finger pointing and blaming, all the avoidance of what caused this, all the dodging of responsibility — will only weaken the brand more. That’s a shame because for the most part Michigan is an incredibly beautiful, pure, place. Now with a diminished future.

    Comments

    Graphene Application Challenge Prize?

    The Graphene Challenge Graphene is a new material that is just in its infancy in terms of commerical usage. It’s from graphite, the stuff in pencils. It’s magical stuff — 150 times stronger than steel, flexible like rubber, and potentially usable in electronics, water filtration, energy, building construction, medical, and more. It’s the thinnest material known to man at this moment. It’s 250 times more conductive or “mobile” than silicon. It hit the news again recently as scientists have discovered a much cheaper way to produce the material. This is a market that is about to explode. It’s frustratingly hard to work with. But that’s the fun part.  Unfortunately for the USA, it would see the prime early movers in




    Read More..
    Comments

    Domain Knowledge Matters Donald Trump

    Call me king of the obvious but I’d like to remind folks about something related to leadership, innovation, and the upcoming election. Domain Knowledge Matters I’m not taking political sides here but I’m going to make a point about Donald Trump’s candidacy. Let’s face it he has captured the attention of a large group of people. This is factual — the polls have him leading the GOP field. My opinion on why he’s doing so well is this: Trump says things that are bold, straightforward, non-PC and they echo the sentiments of many Americans. People love this approach because it’s just not what they’re used to hearing from a politician. I’ll put aside the notions and accusations that he’s racist,




    Read More..
    Comments

    Three Sad Innovation Lessons From Radio Shack

    Keep Punching, Stay True to Yourself and Trends, Make Things The demise of Radio Shack., it’s depressing. Much like Kodak you read the history of events and can point to several ideas not done that could have saved them. You can also point to many ideas they tried that were clearly the wrong bets. Hindsight is better than foresight, but still, if they’d stuck to their original values they might have survived. Radio Shack substituted short sighted management tactics for real innovation and invention and that’s ultimately what killed them. They lost the sense of who they were as a company and that led them down a lot of innovation blind alleys. A once loved brand in consumer electronics, and a




    Read More..
    Comments

    Four Criteria for Hiring an Innovation Speaker

    Four Criteria for Hiring an Innovation Keynoter Let this post work as a guide for meeting planners. You don’t have to hire me as your innovation speaker, but if you hire one, you’ll be well served if you pay attention to these four criteria and my comments in bold. Innovation is a complex, wonky topic and it has some special requirements that go beyond the classic things meeting planners look for in a speaker. Let’s keep this simple and as neutral as possible — my shameless personal plug is at the very bottom. I’m even going to suggest my competition here. So here goes, in my view an Innovation Speaker should: 1. Have a background as a successful entrepreneur and/or




    Read More..
    Comments

    Rural Broadband Necessary for Rural Innovation

    Tuesday– September 23, 2014 It’s nice to see that people are recognizing that innovation isn’t always in Silicon Valley. Writing you today from the countryside in Three Oaks, Michigan, aka “Michiana” — where my poky web access is satellite based. Steve Case’s article earlier this week in the Washington Post  — Why innovation and start-ups are thriving in ‘flyover’ country —  is spot on. Case, you may recall, was co-founder of AOL. He correctly identifies the reasons why Chicago, Denver, Cincinnati, and other smaller cities are becoming vibrant centers of start-ups. He’s asking for investments of time and money to be made in order to further the trend. I agree, and… He didn’t go far enough with his article — he missed one




    Read More..
    Comments

    Big Imagination is Blind Spot Remover

    Coming back from a trip to Toronto (visiting with the amazing Min Basadur) I spotted an interesting billboard at O’Hare airport. IBM suggests they can help “Remove the Blind Spots from Your Business” — by using Big Data and analytics. The visual of a man at a kind of virtual desktop that has visibility to ships, trucks, retail, and factories indicates that if you can just know more about what’s going on out there you’ll have nothing to worry about. If only that were so. I’m not bad rapping IBM here, I’m sure they can indeed provide lots of interesting insight using Big Data and analytics. Many companies would be well served to do a better job with this. Using




    Read More..
    Comments

    Let’s Tax the Boy Scouts

    Do you belong to a Credit Union? Many Americans do, about 97 million to be precise. A large number, although Credit Unions represent only 6% of financial transactions. I’m posting about credit unions because these beneficial organizations are under attack. The link to innovation is profound — credit unions are how many people establish their financial base. People with a financial leg to stand on are the kind of people who start businesses and fuel the economy. Have you ever heard the phrase “building up a stake?” You can’t start a new company, or even a family, with nothing. One must have at least seed money, or more, to get a start-up going. Credit Unions are a great way for




    Read More..
    Comments

    Yes, I Tweet a Bit (Innovators Use Twitter)

    I was just named as one of the Top 50 Innovation tweeters by Innovation Excellence. A tweeter is one who uses Twitter. It’s a fairly informal sort of top 50 list — I don’t think there is a great deal of analysis around content or reach, but still, it’s nice to be recognized. I crossed the 10,000 follower line about a month ago, and weirdly, it felt like a real accomplishment. Then I saw that my friend and colleague Dr. Cindi Burnet (@Cyndiburnett) is over 50,000 followers and I didn’t feel quite so glamorous. And, you get out of Twitter what you put into it. I’m happy with my results at my current time-investment level. 10,000 feels like a “very




    Read More..
    Comments

    The Value of a “Cross Domain” View

      Dr. Orin Davis (@DrOrinDavis) has written up two more short pieces — essentially his reflections from the talks of Rebecca Henderson and Dan Pink at the recent World Innovation Forum. His comments on Pink are somewhat provocative, so, be aware I do not share Orin’s views exactly. Orin is a well read academic (and practitioner as well) and he knows a lot about the wide array of literature that exists for creativity and innovation — that’s why I’ m publishing his insightful work here. His critique of Pink is interesting to me because I was not aware of who Pink borrows from, and, if he is borrowing faithfully to the original research. That said, I think there’s a real value for people




    Read More..
    Comments