Open Innovation

    Temporary Innovation Veep

    1603-worksheet-18eThe case for bringing in a temporary Innovation Veep.*

    “On Call Innovation Director/Mentor/Trainer”?

    What really changes innovation culture? Are you seeking a change in your innovation approach? Is your organization mired in a non-innovative swamp?

    First let me say what does NOT change innovation culture. It’s not that these services that I’ll mention below can’t be helpful, they can. But on there own, they will not change innovation at your organization. There’s one thing that will change culture and I talk about that at the bottom of this post. Don’t skip ahead.

    * Let me acknowledge the ideas of author Michael Foster — we discussed these concepts about a Temp Veep over coffee in San Jose a few weeks ago (@MichaelFostertw). Much of what I say here I owe to that conversation and it inspired me to write this post.

    What Won’t Change Innovation Culture:

    • A one or two day intensive workshop or training by an innovation guru. I do these sorts of gigs, they are a lot of fun, and I think high value. The information can be helpful, maybe even motivationally useful. If the innovation group is motivated, and, has a mandate to do innovation, a training intensive can work as a kick start. However, if there are politics going on, if the leader of the innovation team isn’t strong or well trained, or if there is a lack of hope — it can be a waste of time and money. Political infighting and a lack of momentum can stop a well-intentioned, but poorly led innovation initiative. Don’t let it happen.
    • Conducting a culture assessment to figure out where your innovation culture is right now, a checkpoint. Yes, it is interesting to know, but if you’re asking the question, don’t you already know the answer? The answer is, something’s wrong. If everything was going along swell in innovation would you be asking? I doubt it. It is useful to get metrics on the state of things, but having those metrics will not change anything.  Maybe you need “proof” that the culture is broken, maybe in order to get more resources — and you’d like to know How it’s broken. That’s all fair, but again, it won’t change a thing. What will change things? Keep reading.
    • Having an outside agency or consultancy execute an innovation project. The project itself may work, you might get results, but, it will only change the culture of the organization as long as the consultants are around. The culture shift leaves when they drive away. It shifts back to where it was before the hipster agency got involved. The hipster agency or consultant probably will not focus on helping you build your culture, instead, they tend to focus on the results they’ll be measured by. It might even be worse than allowing innovation to flounder — because the message you’re giving your people is: “You Can’t Do Innovation.”

    So, you might ask, what does work to change innovation culture?

    One thing changes innovation culture: Projects.

    Projects your people do — and are charged to do — change innovation culture. I’m nearly quoting my friend and innovation mentor, Min Basadur, the man who did so much incredible work for P&G. Projects on an on-going basis, ideally on a once a quarter cycle.

    Innovation projects can be very difficult to lead.

    Leading an Innovation Project is challenging — after all innovation nearly by its very nature challenges the status quo. And people resist that kind of change. In an organization where the politics are weird and innovation is a bad word, or people (management) are risk averse, an internal project manager has an uphill battle getting a mandate, resources, and attention. It can happen, but it takes a person who’s aggressive, a good leader and is not afraid to risk their job.  And– they have to know process.

    Why not hire an “On call,” that is, temporary, Innovation Veep?

    Why? Because the right person will have the skill to negotiate the politics, and will know innovation process well enough to keep a project(s) moving forward. Because that person will be hired by management, he or she will also have their support getting started. Ideally the project works well, people learn, and then the temporary director moves on. This would be something like a two month to four month engagement. Once the team is trained in process and has a project under their belt, the temp Innovation Veep hands the reins over to an internal project manager. Culture change has started to happen, the internal team with newly trained leadership can continue the effort.

    Caveat: I think it’s important to emphasize the need for a “capability building” type person, not just a temporary manager, not just a “get it done” consultant. A person with training, mentoring, and process knowledge skills is what you want. It’s also important to find a person who does Not want a career, but has a limited time mandate. A true temporary leader is not threatening to the folks vying for power in the C-suite, and that is not a trivial thing to minimize. That fact alone might be the whole reason this idea makes sense.

    A large percentage of innovation projects do fail. You still have to keep doing them. One project does not change an innovation culture. A series of innovation projects do. Get the assistance you need to crank up regular innovation cycles — that might mean hiring a Temporary Innovation Veep.

    As always, please let me know your thoughts: gregg@greggfraley.com.

     

    Comments

    Seven Essentials of an Effective Innovation Project Manager

    Outsourcing innovation project management might be the most strategic money you spend this year. It’s not a new idea but it’s one more companies should consider. It sure beats doing nothing. See my Seven Essentials for hiring below. But first: If you’ve not got an innovation plan in the process of being executed, right now, you are treading water and will eventually drown. So what’s stopping you from kicking off an innovation initiative? I often hear resources. What I hear from top management: “we don’t have the time or resources for innovation projects, we’ll start later this year.” I get it. How is it possible to do this separate thing that requires its own focus and resources while keeping the




    Read More..
    Comments

    Innovation 2015 or Five Lame Excuses?

    Death or Kryptonite? I have a  vinyl record with one of those strategic skips that has it repeating — it drives me nuts — but I still play the record because I love the song so much. The song is Jimmy Olsen’s Blues by the Spin Doctors. It’s a hard rocker about the lament of Superman’s pal who has a crush on Superman’s gal. In the song Jimmy Olsen is competing with the man of steel for the affection of Miss Lois Lane. He’s got a secret weapon, a pocketful of Kryptonite. Innovation ca feel a lot like that — your competition is a big tough impossible-to-beat player like Superman. And no matter your size as an organization, you’d better be like




    Read More..
    Comments

    Innovation Facilitation — Death is Easy, Magic Takes Training

    Three Essentials for Magical Innovation Facilitation An essential ingredient to successful innovation projects is good facilitation. Who could argue with that? Innovation combines individual and group activities. Good group collaboration is not a given. Even individual activities need coordination with the group effort. You really need an inspiring, confident, well-trained facilitator to enable innovation. I’m talking about running and managing strategy meetings, ideation sessions, virtual sessions (using IMS), concept writing sessions, and other group work. A good facilitator makes a world of difference in the results of these group meetings and activities. And yet, in the long list of things that can go wrong in innovation initiatives, it’s often the one that is overlooked or taken for granted. The problem




    Read More..
    Comments

    Big Imagination is Blind Spot Remover

    Coming back from a trip to Toronto (visiting with the amazing Min Basadur) I spotted an interesting billboard at O’Hare airport. IBM suggests they can help “Remove the Blind Spots from Your Business” — by using Big Data and analytics. The visual of a man at a kind of virtual desktop that has visibility to ships, trucks, retail, and factories indicates that if you can just know more about what’s going on out there you’ll have nothing to worry about. If only that were so. I’m not bad rapping IBM here, I’m sure they can indeed provide lots of interesting insight using Big Data and analytics. Many companies would be well served to do a better job with this. Using




    Read More..
    Comments

    Harvard’s Kodak Moment?

    Have you ever been in the position where you thought, “gee, if only I was better educated, or just smarter, this complex decision in front of me would be easy.” In the innovation world the agonizing decision of whether to embrace a new trend and leave behind your old business model is always brutally dificult. Organizations have been torn to shreds in the conflict about what to do. Some have made those big choices and survived, like IBM, or, made bad choices and bit the dust, like Kodak. Part of the psychology of leadership is the doubt, the fear, that you’re not quite smart enough to make a good decision. One of the reasons people flock to Harvard to get




    Read More..
    Comments

    People Got To Be Free

    Power. It’s not something people talk about in the context of innovation. They talk about Leadership, Change, Management, and Teams — but they rarely talk about what’s behind all of those concepts, Power. I’ve been making a habit lately of talking about the unsaid in innovation, and power is a huge unsaid in innovation. I’m going to have to be a little bit snarky here. I’ll balance that by citing those gurus of innovation, The Rascals (who were in fact genuinely kind hearted guys who worked for civil rights). But first, my citation: Power, wielded with a heavy hand, is the enemy of innovation. Power, aligned with values people believe in, is the enabler of innovation. The higher up an




    Read More..
    Comments

    Minimum Wage Boost in Silicon Valley Ups the Cinderella Factor

    Let’s put politics aside for a moment and pretend the minimum wage is not a party-centric issue. Let’s look at it from a pragmatic perspective if possible. Raising the minimum wage in Silicon Valley (beyond San Jose which has already done so) is a very important and rational thing to do for the economic health of the valley, California, and the USA economy as a whole. I’m sure a lot could be written about the class warfare aspect of this, but to me, the innovation guy, that’s not the key issue. The issue is continuing the incredible innovation that happens in Silicon Valley. As of March 2014 it’s 87% more expensive to live in Silicon Valley than the USA average.




    Read More..
    Comments

    Take Advantage — Innovate More for Less

    I’ve done 385 general interest creativity and innovation posts in the last few years. This post is different — it contains a commercial offer — albeit a fairly innovative one. If you’re not interested please ignore this post. Here’s the offer — I’ve decided to double the value I provide to my customers by offering a good old fashioned two-for-one deal. Why? I want to generate more buzz about my service offerings. To generate more buzz I want the perception of my value to be exceptional. So exceptional that people will talk , tweet, and refer. There is no sleight of hand here, I’ll be working twice for one fee. For both services delivered I won’t be cutting preparation time or the customization I




    Read More..
    Comments

    An Outsider’s Perspective Can Drive Innovation

    I’ve been researching an industry (coin operated vending) in preparation for a speech I’m giving.  I make an effort to tailor my keynotes, as much as is practical, in order to deliver more specific value to my audiences. In doing my research some obvious (to me) opportunity areas for innovation have become apparent. Strangely, when I bring up these interesting and potentially lucrative market adjacencies most of the folks I talk to in the industry reject these potential opportunities with barely a pause in the conversation. It’s true that “I don’t know” why these innovation possibilities can’t work. My argument is, for innovation, that can be a real strength. I’m not “in the box” of the people I’m interviewing, I




    Read More..
    Comments